Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 08:00

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Why is Taylor Swift voting for Kamala Harris?

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Russia can stop this any time.

Chiefs trivia: Your in-5 daily game, Friday edition - Arrowhead Pride

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Apple's latest CarPlay update revives something Android Auto did right 10 years ago [Gallery] - 9to5Google

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Do you have a “no-no” list?

Just in the last 5 years:

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

What are women's true thoughts and feelings on bestiality?

Let’s just make it real clear:

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

A tumultuous week in Los Angeles illustrates the human toll of the Trump administration’s more aggressive immigration crackdown - CNN

What’s next?

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

The U.S. hasn’t seen a new confirmed human bird flu case in nearly 4 months — why? - Yahoo

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Thank you.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

49ers trade a 2026 conditional fifth-round pick for Bryce Huff - NBC Sports

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Do foreign workers face discrimination in Canada?